Monday, August 28, 2006

USA = Paradox

Another proof that the USA is full of contradictions.
When you look at the USA Dollar, you can see a pyramide on the left side.
Now, what do the pyramides have to do with the USA? - Absolutely nothing.
And above the pyramide you can see an eye in a triangle. It's called trinacria and is considered as the delta which stands for change (like in physics, maths, chemistry, ...).
Below the pyramide is something written: ''Novus Ordo Seclorum'' which means: 'New Secular Order'.
''Secular'' means: Not connected with or controlled by a religious authority.
This sentence doesn't fit to the famous ''IN GOD WE TRUST'' (above the ONE).
The historical background:
Most of the scientists think that vice-president Henry Wallace was the one who had told the President, Franklin D. Roosevelt, that Novus Ordo Saeculorum means the same like New Deal (= interventionist reform politics by Roosevelt, which was supposed to recover the economy of the United States during the Great Depression).
I bet half of the people in the US have no idea about this. By the way, I hope this made one thing clear: when we say ''We hate the USA'', we mean the government, not the American people!!

11 comments:

Gassia said...

Well I heard that they were planning on changing the "In God we trust" sentence ... But I don't think this sentence is very related to the secular one ... although u r right with the religion issue ... This just means that the *government* shouldn't be influenced by any religious party. This doesn't have anything to do with the money in my opinion ... of course money is related to the governmet but I guess the main meaning of the secular sentence is wut I said above ... Government shouldn't be under the power or influence of e.g the church like it was some places before ... the church shouldn't be the leading branch .. that's wut I think ... anyways but interesting find and good information but be nicer :P (jkn) :)

Anonymous said...

well...i think you really don't have an idea of anything...no offense...i dont know you personally...but if you had f***ing OPENED your eyes and did proper RESEARCHES..you would probably have found out, that the US. STATE DEPARTMENT translates it as
" A NEW ORDER OF AGES "
hmm...doenst have much to do with secularism ...does it?
(sorry for the rude expressions...but your writings really get me to some point of my blood boiling!)


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novus_Ordo_Seclorum
http://www.greatseal.com/mottoes/seclorum.html

Nadia said...

@ the avenger:
1. About RESEARCHES.. You seem to be one of the superficial people who check everything on wiki.
Go home..
2. I did MANY RESEARCHES.. While you just did two
3. I don't know where you live but it would be useful for you to go to the next bookstore and look for a book called ''Illuminati''.
That was the release for me to check on this information..

Gassia said...

Well I agree with you "the avenger", honestly I didn't think of "reresearching" on this topic and relied on Nadia's theory, which turned out wrong.. even if it meant secular .. I explained my theory and the theory of Madeleine Albright in her book "The Mighty and The Almighty" which I am currently reading is almost the same, she said:

"Seperation of church and state rests on three 'nos': no religious tests for public office, no established state religion, and no abridgement of the right to religious liberty. These principles are essential to our democracy and to our identity as a nation; let us hope that they are never breached. In expressing that wish, however, we must recognize that such a seperation does not require and has not led to the removal of God from the civic life, currency, coinage, patriotic songs, or public rhetoric of the United States. This reality reflects both the depth of America's religious roots and a universal rule of practical politics: religion may be seperated from government, but it is intimately connected to how leaders are judged."

I was really impressed by her words, as she is a very respected politian and woman. Long Live America

Gassia said...

Btw, Wikipedia is a respectable and reliable source. If one article for instance is not a subject of neutrality, they caution and tell ppl.
I protest Nadia!

Nadia said...

@ Gassia:
The same.. Go and read ''Illuminati'' by Dan Brown (he's American, just saying this so our dear friend the avenger doesn't scream ''idiotic arabs'').

That will show you the USA from a totally different point of view..

Nadia said...

@ Gassia:
Wiki is known for having some incorrect information..
Plus, you should never just rely on one source!!

Nadia said...

By the way, ''Illuminati'' is the German version of ''Angels & Demons''.

Anonymous said...

Well....you seem to forget the fact that Dan Brown is a BESTSELLER author, and that does not automatically make everything he writes true. He changes and twists a lot of facts to let them fit into his story. So I think you are the one "superficial" who check everything from ONE Dan Brown book. Oh and if you claim to have done "MANY RESEARCHES", then how would it be, if you published a detailed list of your sources?
And thank you for reminding me that Dan Brown is American. I didn't know that...I really thought he is one of the idiotic arabs.

Nadia said...

As I believe that you won't start checking every single source I'm going to list here, I will just give you this one website which includes a whole discussion about the topic (be happy, you'll find people sharing your opinion) and get convinced of what you think is logical:
http://www.cultofdanbrown.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/110/page/0/view/collapsed/sb/5/o/all/fpart/all/vc/1

Anonymous said...

give me a FULL list of your sources...i am willing to check on every single one of them...if you really have so many sources as claimed